<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exposure and Brightness adjustments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lightroom-news.com/2009/03/21/exposure-and-brightness-adjustments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lightroom-news.com/2009/03/21/exposure-and-brightness-adjustments/</link>
	<description>The latest news about the top pixel wrangling application on the planet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 05:09:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin Evening</title>
		<link>http://lightroom-news.com/2009/03/21/exposure-and-brightness-adjustments/comment-page-1/#comment-14554</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Evening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightroom-news.com/?p=2784#comment-14554</guid>
		<description>In the Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 1.0 book I took the view that the new Tone Curve offered much improved contrast and brightness control compare to the Brightness and Contrast sliders and I still feel the same now about this. However, since my early testing with Lightroom 1.0 and having used Lightroom for several years, I have now moderated that view to say that the Brightness and Contrast sliders are actually still useful as an easy way to fine-tune the brightness and contrast, but must be adjusted after setting the Exposure slider first.

To summarise, there is no real quality issue between the brightness and contrast sliders and the Tone Curve, although it is important to understand that the Brightness/Contrast adjustments are applied first in the pipeline before the TC. Tone Curve is just as valid a tone adjustment, but does offer more flexibility and there is nothing wrong in using Brightness and Contrast and Tone Curve all together. Use whatever works for you. 

As for Auto Tone this is the result of ongoing progress to find the auto adjustment tone logic that works best for any picture. It has been improved with Lightroom 2 compared to Lightroom 1, but you will inevitably see results that are not as good as what you might expect to see if adjusting manually. Typically I find that studio lit shots never process well using Auto Tone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 1.0 book I took the view that the new Tone Curve offered much improved contrast and brightness control compare to the Brightness and Contrast sliders and I still feel the same now about this. However, since my early testing with Lightroom 1.0 and having used Lightroom for several years, I have now moderated that view to say that the Brightness and Contrast sliders are actually still useful as an easy way to fine-tune the brightness and contrast, but must be adjusted after setting the Exposure slider first.</p>
<p>To summarise, there is no real quality issue between the brightness and contrast sliders and the Tone Curve, although it is important to understand that the Brightness/Contrast adjustments are applied first in the pipeline before the TC. Tone Curve is just as valid a tone adjustment, but does offer more flexibility and there is nothing wrong in using Brightness and Contrast and Tone Curve all together. Use whatever works for you. </p>
<p>As for Auto Tone this is the result of ongoing progress to find the auto adjustment tone logic that works best for any picture. It has been improved with Lightroom 2 compared to Lightroom 1, but you will inevitably see results that are not as good as what you might expect to see if adjusting manually. Typically I find that studio lit shots never process well using Auto Tone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: traveler</title>
		<link>http://lightroom-news.com/2009/03/21/exposure-and-brightness-adjustments/comment-page-1/#comment-14553</link>
		<dc:creator>traveler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightroom-news.com/?p=2784#comment-14553</guid>
		<description>Martin,

In your book you recommend using the curve control instead of brightness and contrast, saying that these are only there for legacy reasons.

Could you explain the difference between the two approaches? Are there any situations when it is more benefitial to use brightness/contrast?

Also, why does Lightroom&#039;s Auto Tone feature often make very heavy use of the brightness and contrast sliders (imho usually with poor results)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin,</p>
<p>In your book you recommend using the curve control instead of brightness and contrast, saying that these are only there for legacy reasons.</p>
<p>Could you explain the difference between the two approaches? Are there any situations when it is more benefitial to use brightness/contrast?</p>
<p>Also, why does Lightroom&#8217;s Auto Tone feature often make very heavy use of the brightness and contrast sliders (imho usually with poor results)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcphotography</title>
		<link>http://lightroom-news.com/2009/03/21/exposure-and-brightness-adjustments/comment-page-1/#comment-14536</link>
		<dc:creator>marcphotography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightroom-news.com/?p=2784#comment-14536</guid>
		<description>Off Topic:  I have heard that using the secondary display option can slow down lightroom considerably.  Anyone know if this is true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off Topic:  I have heard that using the secondary display option can slow down lightroom considerably.  Anyone know if this is true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Evening</title>
		<link>http://lightroom-news.com/2009/03/21/exposure-and-brightness-adjustments/comment-page-1/#comment-14529</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Evening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightroom-news.com/?p=2784#comment-14529</guid>
		<description>Yes I did. All I wanted to emphasise here was the effect of Exposure and Brightness. Rather than go through how I achieved all the adjustments and end up with a long movie, I just focussed on these two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I did. All I wanted to emphasise here was the effect of Exposure and Brightness. Rather than go through how I achieved all the adjustments and end up with a long movie, I just focussed on these two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimLR</title>
		<link>http://lightroom-news.com/2009/03/21/exposure-and-brightness-adjustments/comment-page-1/#comment-14528</link>
		<dc:creator>TimLR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 03:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightroom-news.com/?p=2784#comment-14528</guid>
		<description>Martin 
    Did you realize in the picture of the shore and the flower you had the Fill Light slider set at 39?
Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin<br />
    Did you realize in the picture of the shore and the flower you had the Fill Light slider set at 39?<br />
Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
