<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LRVmaker Announced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lightroom-news.com/2008/02/21/lrvmaker-announced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lightroom-news.com/2008/02/21/lrvmaker-announced/</link>
	<description>The latest news about the top pixel wrangling application on the planet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 04:52:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirgles</title>
		<link>http://lightroom-news.com/2008/02/21/lrvmaker-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-9966</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirgles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightroom-news.com/2008/02/21/lrvmaker-announced/#comment-9966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Jeremy in that it&#039;s such a shame Lightroom is so slow.  It&#039;s such a powerful app, but it really feels like it was written in a scripting language.  i.e. it&#039;s very &quot;clunky&quot;.  A simple and fast catalogue viewer really should have been provided by Adobe given Lightroom&#039;s limitations.  But... in the meantime, thanks to Marc for the effort.  I wish LRViewer could search metadata though.  Hopefully that&#039;ll come in future versions...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Jeremy in that it&#8217;s such a shame Lightroom is so slow.  It&#8217;s such a powerful app, but it really feels like it was written in a scripting language.  i.e. it&#8217;s very &#8220;clunky&#8221;.  A simple and fast catalogue viewer really should have been provided by Adobe given Lightroom&#8217;s limitations.  But&#8230; in the meantime, thanks to Marc for the effort.  I wish LRViewer could search metadata though.  Hopefully that&#8217;ll come in future versions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://lightroom-news.com/2008/02/21/lrvmaker-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-9958</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightroom-news.com/2008/02/21/lrvmaker-announced/#comment-9958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s something Adobe should make in the first place with Lightroom itself - fast (Lightroom is enough fast to editing photos but too slow to browse them), free Lightroom archive browser with simple interface. It could be something like Lightroom Library module stand-alone without edit options. And the idea of password protected catalogs it&#039;s something that I&#039;m missing in Lightroom.

I&#039;ve checked LRView Windows Version yesterday. It&#039;s promising app, but it has too many bugs now. :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s something Adobe should make in the first place with Lightroom itself &#8211; fast (Lightroom is enough fast to editing photos but too slow to browse them), free Lightroom archive browser with simple interface. It could be something like Lightroom Library module stand-alone without edit options. And the idea of password protected catalogs it&#8217;s something that I&#8217;m missing in Lightroom.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve checked LRView Windows Version yesterday. It&#8217;s promising app, but it has too many bugs now. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
